Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The History Review


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to School of History and Archives (University College Dublin). (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 02:44, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

The History Review

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This topic about an academic journal appears to fail WP:GNG. Additionally, opinion regarding the notability of Academic journals on Wikipedia can be read at the essay located at Notability (academic journals). Several customized searches in Google News (e.g. ), Google Scholar (e.g. ) and Google Books (e.g. ) are not yielding coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:30, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  18:30, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  18:30, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  18:30, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to School of History and Archives (University College Dublin). It's certainly relevant to that article, even though a standalone article isn't justified. --Michig (talk) 20:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge to School of History and Archives (University College Dublin). It might be notable but don't have access to the databases (Web of Knowledge and Scopus) recommended in Notability (academic journals) for checking. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 06:45, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep -- we commonly allow articles on academic journals, even the less prestigious ones. The fact that it ceased publication last March is irrelevant .  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:23, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure but not every academic journal gets a Wikipedia article simply for being an academic journal. Only those that are considered notable journals, per WP:GNG. I had trouble finding sources about this journal, it appears to be little-known. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 21:14, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.