Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The History of River Trips in Peterborough


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

The History of River Trips in Peterborough

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Poorly written and formatted; this article does not cite any references or sources. It appears to chronicle and advertise a private enterprise and has been tagged for notability since 21 April 2007. Chrisieboy (talk) 20:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete thought it looked familiar and realised I remember looking at it and contemplating a nomination. Even with a number of searches, including this, I find no evidence of notability among a plethora of wiki mirrors. Travellingcari (talk) 21:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless citations to published sources are added. This article reads like an original synthesis based on documentary or oral sources. While it may be very accurate, and I'm sure it's interesting from a local perspective, it's not suited for an encyclopedia article which has to be verifiable from previously published sources. Is there a wiki intended for this kind of article? EALacey (talk) 22:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

'Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks!' -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.