Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The History of the Galactic Republic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 05:09, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

The History of the Galactic Republic
Star Wars fancruft. It looks like an original synthesis on the history of the fictional Star Wars universe. Brian G. Crawford 00:48, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete because. Danny Lilithborne 01:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete after reading the first 7 words of the article... LOL - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 01:13, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * From the article: "Play Knights of the old Republic 1 to find out what happens next!!!" If it's not copyvio from a video-game box, it's original research.  Delete, no need to merge or redirect to a Star Wars history article.  Barno 01:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per CrazyRussian --Deville (Talk) 03:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete and BJAODN per Barno and CrazyRussian, WP:SPAM, WP:NOR, and WP:CRUFT is the least of its problems. Morgan Wick 03:26, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's a poorly written attempt at describing the events leading up to Knights of the Old Republic that's explained far better in various KOTOR-releated articles. BryanG 03:39, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't deserve it's own page. A lot of this stuff is covered in other pages. Badly written too (i know that is not a valid reason though). Geedubber 03:43, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN per Morgan Wick. DarthVad e r 03:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN per Morgan Wick. Dspserpico 03:46, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN per Morgan Wick. Sorry Guy 04:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN per Morgan Wick. --Ter e nce Ong 05:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per BryanG --Icarus 05:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN per Morgan Wick. Delete Changing vote after reviewing what constitues a BJAODN Aeon 06:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, don't send it to BJAODN, as it's not funny.   Proto    ||    type    09:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I definitely second that - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 14:55, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thirded, but most of BJAODN isn't funny either. Kotepho 21:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment er...I think this is covered in some other article already M1ss1ontomars2k4 14:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Info is already elsewhere on Wikipedia. Pat Payne 17:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fancruft, advertising. Not funny enough for BJAODN. J I P  | Talk 17:29, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, also factually and temporally incorrect. Tokakeke 18:32, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think I really need to state a reason explicitly. Kotepho 21:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to Galactic Republic. Redxiv 22:24, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, and please do not put it on BJAODN. Absolutely nothing funny,just rubbish -- H eptor  talk 23:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, this sort of thing would be better if properly formatted and inserted in Galactic Republic--KefkaTheClown 17:56, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment this should not be merged to Galactic Republic. This information is completely incorrect. Tokakeke 01:10, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Is there anyway to have this deleted it looks like we have a solid conseus Aeon 13:39, 28 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Notable events, but covered with greater accuracy at Mandalorian War. -LtNOWIS 15:57, 29 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.