Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Holocaust in curricula


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Even those arguing for merging essentially believe the content is worth preserving. At this point of time, there seems to be no consensus for such a merge but if this changes, it can be discussed at the talk pages.  So Why  10:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

The Holocaust in curricula

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

TheLongTone (talk) 16:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Oops, Twinkle rather ran away with me here. IMO this could be speedied as duplicating the topic {{Education about the holocaust]], created by the autor of this article. I'm dubious about their Genocide education as well....TheLongTone (talk) 16:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:04, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:04, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi TheLongTone, Thanks for your concern. Could you please specify why you think Education about the holocaust and The Holocaust in curricula are duplicates? Curricula is a "key component" of Education about the Holocaust, and that is articulated in the article. These articles were created as part of a project that uses Wikipedia's and UNESCO's open license/open access policies to create and improve articles. If you have any doubts as to the legitimacy of these articles, Genocide education included, please consult the cited publications. If you have any questions about the project, please consult John Cummings. Thank you. (A.mart82)

Hi, can I request nothing is 'speedied'. I don't agree they are the same subject but I don't pretend to have enough in depth knowledge of the subject to know whether it is suitable to merge this article into another or to leave as it is. --John Cummings (talk) 09:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge with Education about the holocaust. Per Article size, there's no need to have a separate article on this subtopic. The style is somewhat prolix and underreferenced and could be edited down. Although the articles don't do a very good job of establishing notability, I don't think the notability of the topic is in question as it regularly comes up in newspapers etc. But I don't think education and curricula are separate topics, even though the articles have different focuses (like having articles on restaurant food and restaurant menus.) --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:23, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge per previous. This has the feel of a not very good academic essay, not an encyclopedic article.  Inevitably each country will do this differently, so that I am not sure that a worldwide synthesis is useful to have.  Peterkingiron (talk) 19:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

 {{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
 * Keep - This is a large expansion of Education about the holocaust - and is not the same thing. Holocaust education is much-much broader than just school curriculum - and includes museums, documentaries, films, etc. This not short (and much expanded) article focuses on formal instruction in a school setting. "Education about the holocaust" isn't about Education in the sense of the education system - but encompasses all community outreach efforts.Icewhiz (talk) 12:19, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America{{sup| 1000 }} 01:27, 23 May 2017 (UTC)  {{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America{{sup| 1000 }} 00:49, 30 May 2017 (UTC) {{clear}}
 * Keep-Reasons above, this is part of a project.TeeVeeed (talk) 10:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep -- this appears to be a reasonable split; the present article is quite large so a merge back to the target article would be difficult. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.