Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Holy Sisters of the Gaga Dada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. v/r - TP 00:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

The Holy Sisters of the Gaga Dada
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

After lengthy research, I regret to say the subject of this article does not meet general Notability guidelines. The one reference is a dead link, also. SarahStierch (talk) 18:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete – I also found lots of things on the net that aren't WP:RS, and a handful of singular mentions in reliable publications. This doesn't approach WP:BASIC requirements, and doesn't pass WP:BAND either. JFHJr (㊟) 19:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   11:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Weak keep. Quick Google search turns up substantial coverage found in two LA Times articles (1987) and (1986), plus a few mentions in magazines and scholarly works for which I can see only snippets e.g.. --Arxiloxos (talk) 06:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Arxiloxos. The two LA Times articles are just enough to meet criterion 1 of WP:BAND, and a third notes that "The Holy Sisters of the Gaga Dada are featured in "Once Upon Her Time," a TV program about women in the '80s airing on the Lifetime Cablevision Network".  Gongshow  Talk 08:57, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets criteria 1 and 10 of WP:BAND. Ronald Joe Record (talk) 08:30, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 02:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.