Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hooping Life


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  → Call me  Hahc  21  02:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

The Hooping Life

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wholly unremarkable and un-notable documentary film. Refs are just trailers, so we can be certain it exists but little more. Nothing that establishes any notability. Fails WP:MOVIE.  Velella  Velella Talk 14:48, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:GNG due to a lack of coverage, much less significant, from any reliable source at all. I was not able to find any reviews or interviews. If these surface, then we can reassess this film's notability. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 15:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Amy Goldstein as being sourcable as one of this filmmaker's works, even if failing notability standards for a separate article. ??   Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:05, 14 March 2014 (UTC) Struck. See below
 * Weak keep. I found several sources that talk about the film, although I haven't really found any very in-depth reviews. I do think that the current coverage is enough to warrant keeping the article as it is now, though. I do want to note that the film was used as a source in this academic text. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:22, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - is this academic ref the same film? The date shown is 2007 yet this film has yet the film had its premier in 2010. Confused.  Velella  Velella Talk 09:55, 14 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep through the diligent efforts of showing it as meeting WP:NF. Always happen to reconsider when issues are addressed during an AFD.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:50, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources found. I didn't realize the film was around since 2007. I've found this by Well+Good NYC which seems reputable, this by Edmonton Journal, and this by Australian Film Critics Association. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 14:31, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.