Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Horror Project (2013 Film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Will userfy upon request. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:18, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

The Horror Project (2013 Film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTABILITY; Googling "The Horror Project" "Focus Films" returns just 15 unique hits, none of which suggest notability at this stage. Nat Gertler (talk) 14:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:11, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:12, 16 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete for failing WP:NF in that as an unreleased film with no coverage it fails WP:NFF. If or when release is confirmed, and only if it gets coverage, we might consider an article on this topic.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 20:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Incubate (or delete). Too soon for a Wikipedia article.  It may attain notability later.  Incubation will allow work to continue on the article while it waits to establish notability.  Deletion is also acceptable, but I think there's some degree of hope for this article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:00, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd be okay with userfying, as returning it to its author as a Userspace Draft and offering instruction and advice would benefit the project in ways an incubation might not.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 04:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * That was going to be my original suggestion, but then I settled on incubation to avoid saddling anyone with unwanted responsibility. I figured incubation might be less imposing than unceremoniously dumping into user space, but since you put it that way, maybe userfy is the proper course to take. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:28, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * +I would be fine with userfying.-Nat Gertler (talk) 13:10, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.