Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The House (2006 Film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy deleted as CSD-G7. Xoloz 05:01, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

The House (2006 Film)
Does not show significance of the article in question. Also note, nothing links to it, and most of the edits were made by two people, who are most likely A)The same person, B) Worked on the film, or C) Both. Carados 08:58, 28 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:Vanity/WP:Importance --66.82.9.80 09:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or transwiki A well-written article, and it must find some place on appropriate wiki. On Wikicities, maybe - could anyone suggest the authors an appropriate wiki for publishing? Also, I'm not so sure about insignificance - it might be notable, though chances aren't high. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 11:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Well-written or not, this is clearly a mis-use of Wikipedia as repository of the primary and sole documentation on a student film. Wikipedia is not a publisher of first instance nor a free wiki host.  Films have to be documented outside of Wikipedia first, and by sources that are independent of the filmmakers.  This film doesn't even have an IMDB article, let alone any reviews by film critics.  (The 2006 film by this title in IMDB is a completely different film, written by David Krae.)  The place for this sort of article is the authors' own web site. The article is unverifiable and original research. Delete. Uncle G 13:17, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Uncle G. --Metropolitan90 14:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as not-notable under WP:NOTFILM guidelines, as well as WP:V and WP:OR concerns. If author(s) can cite verifiable sources that this, "Has received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking," or "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial news stories describing its artistic or societal impact" I would consider it notable. Scorpiondollprincess 14:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete? Yea, fine, delete it. I didn't realise wikipedia was so damn stingy about this stuff.  I thought it was just a place to share information.  The film has been submitted to festivals and we're awaiting results, but, I guess it doesn't live up to this "code of conduct" stuff yet.  So, delete it.  I personally don't see how it hurts anybody just sitting there, but hey, guess I didn't read the fine print.  Thanks for keeping it up for the two weeks. IAmJack600 10:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Please do not take it personally. Best of luck at your festivals! And if the film does win some awards and later achieves some notability (and you can cite some sources on that), by all means, you are always welcome to recreate this article then! Scorpiondollprincess 15:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment Tagging with db-author, but good luck anyway in your film festival. Feel free to re-create if you win some awards. :) --Core des at talk. ^_^ 00:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.