Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The House of Flowers: The Movie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  13:25, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

The House of Flowers: The Movie

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable future film, fails WP:NFF. Looks to not be notable enough once released as well, should be merged and redirected into The House of Flowers (TV series). Donaldd23 (talk) 12:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep The film and the TV show are separate, such a merge would be highly inappropriate considering that each of the TV show's seasons have their own articles, as does a (more closely-related) previous spin-off TV movie. I already explained this, so it just looks like you have some inexplicable vendetta against this article existing. If you want to delete because it's FUTURE, like I said, it's going to be released in less than two weeks, what would the point be to have a delete on record when it's recreated so soon afterwards? Kingsif (talk) 14:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability seems to be established, and whilst I do not think it would be completely far-fetched to draftify it until release, I do think two weeks is a short period, and draftifying it for such a short while would be rather odd. Anonymous 7481 (talk)
 * Keep. The existence of this article is in line with customary Wikipedia practices. Notability seems to be tentatively established. Shooting has already wrapped and the film is set to be released barely 10 days from now. I am missing production details, but that circumstance is not a compelling deletion rationale.--Asqueladd (talk) 22:23, 12 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.