Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Humble Guys

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP. jni 12:44, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

The Humble Guys
Piracy group. Big deal. Google search for "The Humble Guys" +piracy brings up 164 hits. &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 22:47, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Keep nice sarcastic VfD there batman... Come on do I need to use a cluestick? Wiki is not a soapbox Don't disrupt to prove a point  ALKIVAR &trade;[[Image:Radioactive.svg|18px|]] 23:00, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Lestat Keep Lestat Keeps are normally not allowed under Wikipedia rules but this seems a special case. --Jscott 23:02, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. *ahem*  I am showing off a bit more of my gams than I normally like to do, but let's just say I was familiar with the pirating community when these guys were around and they had one of the biggest operations in their time.  They were on top for several years, until their ring was busted by the Secret Service when a couple of their head honchos stupidly used stolen credit card numbers to buy some musical equipment (Phrack published one of her statements in this issue).  IMHO, they deserve an entry.  Katefan0 23:37, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Just looked at your userpage. If you were in ACiD, you oughta know this stuff yourself. Now Alkivar's comments are making sense. ACiD and iCE, this little walk down memory lane is making me want to bust out the ANSI ads for my old board. Katefan0 23:46, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, are you being serious radman? Rhobite 01:03, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, but with reservations. Article needs a cleanup. Megan1967 06:10, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep (?) Seems notable. JuntungWu 17:01, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article does not establish why this guys are notable although it is well-written.Capitalistroadster 06:44, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I think RadMan's just blowin' off a bit of steam. Wyss 23:43, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * keep. Yuckfoo 01:09, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. ElBenevolente 00:54, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow for organic growth. GRider\talk 17:28, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)