Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Humongous Book of Dinosaurs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn. SL93 (talk) 22:39, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

The Humongous Book of Dinosaurs

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I only found trivial mentions for this book. SL93 (talk) 23:37, 11 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Looking through the google news archives, I see lots of articles about the book when it came out in 1997 that look like non-trivial mentions. It was also reviewed by Kirkus. The article's current state leaves much to be desired, but I think it can be built up with the available sources. —Torchiest talkedits 14:36, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 12 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC)




 * Keep - The topic passes WP:GNG, having received significant coverage in reliable sources:
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 02:29, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 02:29, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 02:29, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 02:29, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Has enough coverage; might be worth checking library journals too for other reviews. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:59, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.