Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hunter (game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per consensus and sources found.  TheAE  talk / sign  21:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

The Hunter (game)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

user:Washingtonhunter has at least found a glowing review of this game but I am still dubious about its notability. Sgroupace (talk) 03:12, 18 April 2009 (UTC) http://www.thirteen1.com/Issues/1313409/mag.php http://www.gamesradar.com/pc/the-hunter/review/the-hunter/a-2009042017111771068/g-20080924145840640081 Washingtonhunter (talk) 10:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.  --  J mundo 03:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Metacritic also has a second review listed - Mgm|(talk) 09:25, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as the two reviews are in-depth enough to show the required notability. Hobit (talk) 12:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Four reviews listed here http://www.gamerankings.com/pc/954010-the-hunter/index.html, IGN hands-on added to wiki listing. Washingtonhunter —Preceding undated comment added 16:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 12:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thirteen 1 and games radar also have coverage:
 * Keep both the IGN and GamePro sources are reliable, and in-depth (also the IGN is a "hands-on" preview, which means they're actually commentating on what they've been playing). I wouldn't use any of the other sources on Metacritic/GameRankings, I don't think any of them could pass for reliable having poked around them before. However, there's also this small piece penned by a ginuwine journalist, it's always worth checking who's behind even the most modest of sites, you wouldn't know that Rock Paper Shotgun is written by 4 UK games journalists if you didn't look, New Enthusiast looks like an Australian variant of the same format. Someoneanother 17:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Games Radar is another solid site, that makes four decent sources, there's more than enough here for our needs. Someoneanother 14:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep – the sources mentioned above are sufficient for notability. MuZemike 13:58, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.