Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The IRG Solution


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:38, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

The IRG Solution

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

appears to fail WP:GNG, found mentions of it but not substantial; article seems to be independent analysis of the book that only cites the book; half a dozen articles were created based on the book's neologisms. —Мандичка YO 😜 14:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge with Information Routing Group or delete if that is not found to be notable. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 07:52, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge as per Qwertyus. Not encyclopedic as written; reads like an essay; no RS. LaMona (talk) 16:15, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: If this is the mother article, it needs to go, along with its brood. Apparently, someone really believes in the book's approach. I grok. However, private manias are better served with a soap box or Facebook than Wikipedia. No indication that this "analysis" is an established pivot in history, psychology, business management, or any other form of religion. Hithladaeus (talk) 19:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.