Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Imperial Party of India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:56, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

The Imperial Party of India

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Completely unsourced (no sources seem to exist); thoroughly fails WP:GNG. Creator has continued to re-create this article in mainspace despite multiple draftifications, so this is the next step; this way also gets us WP:G4, which it seems we'll need. Curbon7 (talk) 08:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 08:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 08:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Addendum: This seems to be a very minor party; they run very few candidates and only garner a few hundred votes. Curbon7 (talk) 08:45, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete some very brief passing mentions in the Indian press but no WP:SIGCOV. FOARP (talk) 10:22, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Draftify : As a political party registered under the Election Commission of India, it is advisable to move the article to the draft space without deleting Padavalam🌂   ►  11:31, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:GNG is the standard it needs to meet, not whether a party has managed to get itself registered with an authority. No point draftifying if the article is literally never going to pass WP:GNG based on the present level of coverage. FOARP (talk) 14:06, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * , I've tried that! There are currently like 3 or 4 version of this article sitting in draftspace. Curbon7 (talk) 19:14, 29 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - obvious POV pushing and COI. I've removed some of the most blatant spam and attacks. — Voice of Clam 16:47, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, Does not meet WP:GNG Alex-h (talk) 14:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.