Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Imperial Physician


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow keep. (non-admin closure) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 18:55, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

The Imperial Physician

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A short story with no indication of notability. Current article consists of a short plot summary and two quotes from a single essay source. Searches turned up thousands of hits for the expression, but I couldn't find anything on this particular short story.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:49, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:06, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:06, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. The footnotes clearly cite multiple independent sources on literary criticism of this classical short story. Deryck C. 13:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Snow keep Nominator has no idea what he's talking about and did not perform his due diligence (perhaps realising that there would be way more foreign-language coverage) in nominating this article for deletion. Sad indeed! Kingoflettuce (talk) 13:58, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as stated above. Also an example of WP:BIAS. &#8209;&#8209; Yodin T 14:06, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.