Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Incontrovertibility of Rainbows


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger One ping only 22:40, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

The Incontrovertibility of Rainbows

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested prod. Could not find evidence of notability or Notability (books). Appears it may be self-published. maclean (talk) 05:31, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:GNG, I cannot find a single source, yet alone "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" which the criteria seeks. Nimuaq (talk) 10:50, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I did a search for the title and the year the novel is set in, yet was unable to find anything except this Wikipedia entry, the merchant's site, and various links that all come back to this AfD in some form or fashion. It's just not notable at this point in time. It doesn't help that the article contains some OR/promotional speak.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   14:03, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a blatant copyright violation of its only reference. Out of 5 sentences in the article, 3 are the same has this, and one is probably original research. I did a web search and aside from the one ref and the article, there was nothing in the first 100 websites. King Jakob  C 14:58, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: No indication of notability, and I couldn't find any significant coverage whatsoever. Lugia2453 (talk) 17:57, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete aside from the fact that it seems entirely made of original research, the article's contents is only a plot summary that does not seem to satisfy WP:NBOOK. Mkdw talk 23:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:57, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.