Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Infographics Show (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

The Infographics Show
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Inline sources few and unreliable, few no mention of notability by trusted secondary sources. This is the third nomination, however the second nomination generated a few good ideas on why it should be deleted. 2003  LN  6  19:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  2003   LN  6  19:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation, Education, Internet,  and Slovenia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I will go with delete on this one. The sources really are an issue. In the previous discussion, Interested Engineering was outlined as the only relevant source, but that article covers only a single video with an interesting topic. After some searching, I found some more passing mentions of the same type but no in depth coverage one would expect for GNG. At least the basic details would need to be covered by some other source than youtube itself to meet the GNG. --Tone 19:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree. The listed sources in the article seem really out-of-place and don't discuss the entire subject, only a few notable videos. 2003   LN  6  01:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete easily fails WP:GNG -1ctinus📝  🗨  19:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per DannyC55. Aaron Liu  (talk) 13:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.