Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Institute of American and Talmudic Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:56, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

The Institute of American and Talmudic Law

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Borderline, hence it sitting in CAT:NN for 11 years, but I couldn't establish that it passes the threshold of notability. It does have mentions, but mainly in advert-like articles and primary sources. I'm not sure this would count as a college as such. Boleyn (talk) 06:49, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is not a college; it's an organization that runs seminars for continuing legal education. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES is not applicable. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Absolutely, it offers qualifications though which made it a subject I hadn't assessed the notability of before. Boleyn (talk) 07:04, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   16:29, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:39, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete The organization does not have inherent notability and a search of Google doesn't turn up reliable and verifiable sources about the organization to establish notability. Alansohn (talk) 01:27, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:29, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep It might pass WP:ORG, as there are multiple reliable secondary sources mentioning it (even Antonin Scalia attended one of their conferences according to The New York Times). They are also mentioned in The Forward, but I don't know how significant the coverage is because I experienced difficulty opening the link that is in the article. StonyBrook (talk) 19:42, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * delete, sources exist that demonstrate the existence of the organisation but coverage is trivial. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 20:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.