Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The International Playboys


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Secret account 22:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

The International Playboys

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats ).

non-notable Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Here's an article that indicates they might be notable.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  22:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 7 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:23, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 9.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  01:05, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Not a big-time band to be sure, but there appears to be a bit of coverage of their work: here, here, and perhaps a few others if these write-ups can be verified.  Gong   show  08:57, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 00:58, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:09, 23 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak keep Fairly marginal but I think the MU Maneater article listed above and the Straight.com article could establish notability on their own, and unless we assume that the band's press section is completely fabricated, they've been reviewed pretty widely. --Cerebellum (talk) 12:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.