Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The International School at ParkCity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 18:35, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

The International School at ParkCity

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable school. Already speedy deleted three times. Article is promotional, with no references. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:13, 8 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: there is almost no information here, and certainly nothing to suggest notability. ubiquity (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 00:05, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 00:05, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. The article is a mess, but after digging thorough the school's website, I found references to a secondary school section. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep as a secondary school per longstanding consensus and precedent. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:14, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - I see nothing promotional in the article. We keep high schools because experience shows that, with enough research, sources can almost invariably be found that meet WP:ORG. Google is a poor tool for finding sources on Malaysian schools in English. We need to avoid systemic bias and allow time for local hard-copy and local language sources to be investigated. The Whispering Wind (talk) 02:39, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep As per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, per the long-standing consensus mentioned above, which presumably exists to foster a logical vehicle on Wikipedia for the defamation of teachers and classmates. There seem to be sources that can at least verify basic details, such as . --Mkativerata (talk) 05:05, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.