Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Investigation of Nanoparticle from Sol-Gel Method


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I don't see how this unsourced, hyper-technical, possibly-OR content could be usefully merged, sorry Bearian.  Sandstein  05:30, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

The Investigation of Nanoparticle from Sol-Gel Method

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Hopeless technically complicated. The weird "opening statement" in italics indicates a probable WP:OR problem too, as evidenced by the lack of sources. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 11:50, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:14, 24 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Much too detailed and there's already Nanoparticle. (But of course you've heard of Brown motion.) Clarityfiend (talk) 22:50, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. The articles are so badly written as to be hopeless. Material is covered elsewhere. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:25, 25 June 2012 (UTC).
 * Merge - an overly technical article, possibly a synthesis of sources, which could be included in Nanoparticle or Brownian motion. I actually own an English translation of Albert Einstein's monograph on Brownian motion and related topics, which would be a "better" source than his original, primary, groundbreaking 1905 article. Bearian (talk) 00:44, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.