Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Island Of Dr. Mogulus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete, per author's request. --JoanneB 10:44, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

The Island Of Dr. Mogulus
Appears non-notable; only three google hits. --Robert Merkel 08:19, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails to show or assert verified notability to the levels outlined by the current version of WP:BIO .-- blue 520  08:29, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn.-- blue 520  10:18, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

IN REPLY FROM AUTHOR

this story has been published. If you do a google search as simply "Island of Mogulus", you get the following result I sat with the author of the book today and spent 4 hours on this entry. please provide advice as to what needs to be done to comply. I would be more than happy to do so.

''I am the original author of the flagged entry and used the authors' name to sign up. But it was my idea to post the article for him.''Glenn King
 * Delete the additional info posted by the author is a blog Nuttah68 09:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely NN fanfic. To answer the author; to achieve notability per these guidelines - "books with an ISBN-number and/or availability in a couple dozen of libraries and/or a Project Gutenberg type website, and with a notability above that of an average cookbook or programmers manual would qualify."  Get the book published, basically.  Tevildo 10:06, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Upgrade to Speedy G7 per reply below and blanking by original author. (It's wikipedia.org, incidentally).  Tevildo 10:39, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

IN REPLY FROM AUTHOR

this is not a fanfic. reading the article would have shown you would know this.

As per the fact that the author doesnt' have an Isbn number, there are articles on this site that I have read that have not been flagged about things as irrelevant as FORUM THREADS. this led me to believe this site was something it is not.

I also suggest if articles like this are irrelevant, and editing is so reversible, to hold higher standards as per who gets to edit and who gets to create articles.
 * Delete I myself wish the article to be removed. And I doubt Wikipedia.com will hold as much cred with me in the future as it used to.

''I am the original author of the flagged entry and used the authors' name to sign up. But it was my idea to post the article for him.''Glenn King


 * Delete per nom and Tevildo. After a good look around I can not find any thing that points to being well-known or remarkable.  blue  520  10:36, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.