Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jellyfish


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. per WP:SNOW Hers fold  (t/a/c) 04:33, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

The Jellyfish

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't really think that something like this warrants an entry in Wikipedia. Is it really encyclopedic? MacMedtalk stalk 20:59, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: It is also completely unsourced. MacMedtalk stalk 21:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Just one line. Not notable. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 21:45, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete In-universe trivia. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:52, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources Rirunmot (talk) 22:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete I have added a reliable source. I do not have much information on this subject because there is not much information on it. I feel that if a Star Trek enthusiast found this article, they would add more information. I know there is more information out there. This article should stay because The Jellyfish is a legitimate name for this starship and it deserves a page just as much as all other starships do. It was in the new Star Trek movie and played an important role too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.53.29.213 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 25 June 2009
 * Comment: I have removed that source as it was a wiki and therefore unreliable. Also, if the above poster could sign their posts, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, MacMedtalk stalk 00:45, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, the article lacks any evidence of received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, failing the nutshell description of the English Wikipedia's Notability guideline. —   pd_THOR  undefined | 01:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Star Trek (film). Apathetic as to whether underlying article is deleted. --EEMIV (talk) 03:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You know what. Screw Wikipedia if there isnt room for another Star Trek ship on here!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.53.29.213 (talk • contribs) 18:11, 25 June 2009
 * Delete Not notable. Capitalismojo (talk) 23:11, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.