Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jem Star


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. and WP:SALT. j⚛e deckertalk 02:50, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

The Jem Star

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Self-published book, with no references -- or even a suggestion -- of real-world notice. Calton | Talk 18:00, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 27 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. This honestly should have been salted after the first three times it was re-created back in 2008. I can't find anything to show that this self-published book is ultimately notable. Given that Calton's PROD was removed with the accusation that it (adding the PROD) was vandalism, I'd wager that when this is deleted (and it's a when, not an if) it would just be re-created once again. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:49, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * By this I mean that the random IP removing the PROD as "vandalism" shows that someone is watching the article and that odds are that the same person will likely make an account and re-add the article at some point in time, so salting it would be a good pre-emptive measure. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:59, 29 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - I can find no significant coverage in independent reliable sources that would establish this book as notable. none whatsoever. -- Whpq (talk) 13:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. Little coverage at all, RS or not, and most of that is on sales sites. Utterly non-notable. And should be salted per Tokyogirl79. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 14:40, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.