Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jetty Journals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:54, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

The Jetty Journals

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a non-notable, self-published e-book with no assertion of notability. AniMate  draw  14:18, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Book has indeed so far received no attention at all from reliable sources. 23 Distinct Google hits, nothing in Google News and so on. Fram (talk) 12:25, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  weak keep  sources seems to indicate some sort of notability. so to delete it is not an option for me atleast.--Judo112 (talk) 13:04, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  23:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete The sources are a website of the same name, and an IMDB entry regarding a movie with similar themes, therefore the article has no reliable sources to back up it's notability. ArcAngel (talk) 06:24, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Like most e-books, non-notable. Joe Chill (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't understand the weak keep. The references consist on a link to IMDB for 28 Days Later dues to a statement about zombification.  It has nothing to do with this work and does not reference it.  And even if it did, it wouldn't be a reliable source.  The other reference is to its own website -- hardly independent.  My own search finds no coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:38, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep per earlier statements plus more research from me personally. indicates notabilty.--Judo112 (talk) 14:03, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Can you please share this research with us please? -- Whpq (talk) 14:10, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.