Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jime


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 14:24, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

The Jime

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The are two sources in this article: 1) 'Planet Rockabilly USA', with no URL or publication information. Google doesn't find any references to 'Planet Rockabilly USA' aside from The Jime's own sites and posts. 2) 'anchormans stray cat site', which is a dead link to what looks like someone's personal site on euronet.nl. I've looked, and I'm not able to find more sources. As such, I think this article fails the general notability guideline and the notability criteria for musicians. MrOllie (talk) 16:17, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 13 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment -- I added one reference (an article in a small alternative weekly). But I have been unable to find any coverage in Danish newspapers or magazines. And was unable to find coverage sources with quotes on the band website (for example, the German magazine Rockin' Fifties does not list an article for this band in its contents (Rockin' Fifties History) or (lexikon/inhalt) pages.) As such, unless some other coverage can be found, there doesn't seem to be enough here to pass WP:GNG. — Cactus Writer (talk) 23:06, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete -- Per my comment above, this fails WP:GNG. No demonstration of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. — Cactus Writer (talk) 18:29, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete wasn't able to find any more coverage in reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:51, 1 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: this AfD was not transcluded onto the daily log, when it was relisted


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio  Let's talk about it! 12:41, 9 October 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.