Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jimmy Timmy Power Hour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was '''No consensus to delete. This needs references or it should fail its next AfD'''. 1 != 2 03:18, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

The Jimmy Timmy Power Hour

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Non-notable cartoon episode. Ridernyc (talk) 16:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Keep. Re the template placed there, probably worth keeping the article as the project was a semi-notable fusion of two popular cartoon franchises supported by two different production teams. Such an occurrence is/was semi-rare, a la Who Framed Roger Rabbit?. Still, I'll be duplicating the present content to nickelodeon.wikia.com just in case. knoodelhed (talk) 17:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions.  -- Hiding T 17:07, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kubigula (talk) 23:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete It does not assert notability with reliable sources, and it doesn't look like anything decent will be able to come out of it. TTN (talk) 01:09, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. While the article needs a decent cleanup, a Google News Archive search comes up with a number of reliable sources. . Capitalistroadster (talk) 01:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm tired of unreferenced articles. If there are verifiable and reliable sources, let the defenders provide them. Without sources each statement can be deleted until the article is blank, then it can be deleted for having no content. Let's keep it simple: no references means delete - and then maybe creators will start providing references. Sbowers3 (talk) 23:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.