Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Natalie Sandtorv was kept and this will head the same way, Google brings up tons of sources and as noted below means MUSIC. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

The Jist

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article Natalie Sandtorv is currently in an AfD process. Even if the article manages to pass the AfD, there is definitely no need for two articles on this topic. The info contained here is largely already present in the article about Sandtorv. rayukk &#124; talk 15:10, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Musicians or ensembles may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria: 1. Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself. -This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries. The Jist duo meets this by far. Knuand (talk) 17:25, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep only if more coverage can be found....if not, 'delete for now and draft and userfy until a better article is achievable. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  06:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  TT me 14:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 November 14.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 22:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.