Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Johannine Comma (The Grammatical Argument)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   snowball delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 23:37, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

The Johannine Comma (The Grammatical Argument)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is an essay, and another article on the subject (Comma Johanneum) already exists. If anything, content worthy of inclusion in the existing article should be merged and the subject of this debate deleted or redirected. Also, all implausible redirects associated with the subject of this debate (including Johannine Comma (2), 1 John 5:7 (2), and 1 John 5:7a should be deleted. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 22:07, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. If it were to be merged, I would have to suggest that it be linked properly. Right now, all I can read is a gigantic blob of a dozen paragraphs or so.  Lady  ★  Galaxy  22:14, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: I decided to ignore stylistic concerns in favor of the more pressing issues, but I agree wholeheartedly. :) Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 22:17, 25 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, due to essays not belonging. Master of Puppets  Call me MoP! :)  22:58, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, Comma Johanneum covers the issue well.--Grahame (talk) 01:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unsourced essay that is redundant to Comma Johanneum. B.Wind (talk) 02:03, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, as redundant to Comma Johanneum, doesn't appear to be amything worth merging (although I did lose the will to live about two-thirds of the way through it and only skimmed the remainder) and not worth keeping even as a redirect. It also seems to be original research. Nancy  talk  06:30, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.