Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Journal of Performance Measurement


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

The Journal of Performance Measurement

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Journal (on the topic of investment) does not cite reliable, third-party sources discussing its notability, and does not GNG. Current sources are its own journal articles. I was unable to find any sources supporting the journal's notability. I have access to the ISI Journal Citation Reports, and it has not been ranked there for an impact factor. Does not seem to meet the criteria of WP:NJOURNAL. (I acknowledge this not policy, but I think it is the best criteria available aside from general criteria). I, Jethrobot drop me a line 18:02, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Indeed, the journal does not appear to be indexed anywhere, in particular, it does not have an impact factor. WorldCat search only gives 3 or 4 academic libraries in the world that carry the journal.. GoogleScholar gives only about 5-6 papers from the journal, in its 14-year history, with any significant citability. In all, does not appear to pass Notability (academic journals) (which, although not an official guideline, still provides the most useful guidance in this case). Nsk92 (talk) 11:32, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  01:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete does not meet WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:20, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom, NSK92, and Headbomb. --Crusio (talk) 03:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.