Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Karate Guard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. NW ( Talk ) 18:44, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

The Karate Guard

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )



The Karate Guard is not one of the original Tom and Jerry cartoons because it is not sourced that it was released theatrically, and I seriously doubt that this is one of the main cartoons. Also, there appears to be only one source on here, and, although it meets Wikipedia's requirements, it is not very fitting here. StevenMario (talk) 20:57, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - article may requite additional sourcing, but this is not grounds for deletion. The short definitely exists, and is clearly notable due to its direct connections to Joseph Barbera (which is not in doubt, as reviews and listings for commercial releases mention it). TheRealFennShysa (talk) 21:35, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Maybe so, but it is, in my opinion, not one of the original shorts because it wasn't made during the Golden Age of American animation.StevenMario (talk) 21:55, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * However, your opinion about whether it "counts" or not doesn't determine notability. Your doubts about it being a "real" cartoon are mistaken and unfounded. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 21:55, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, nomination seems POINT-y and I (and others) are beginning to see doubts about the wisdom of unblocking nominator vindicated. Steven, if I were you I'd focus on proving that I could find sources for the apparent OR edits. Daniel Case (talk) 21:59, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * weak Keep, seem notable barely Jeepday (talk) 23:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Is there such thing as a weak keep? I don't know if it counts. StevenMario (talk) 18:42, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * tho I have no opinion I, I often say 'weak keep", meaning on balance i think it should be kept, but if you think otherwise,couldn't say you;re not being reasonable & I wouldn' t argue the matter, as distinct from plain keep, where if you think otherwise, I think you probably arent judging it right. (and similarly for weak delete.    DGG ( talk ) 04:11, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.