Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Killer (1972 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 18:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

The Killer (1972 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I added a review that I felt supported notability. Another editor reverted and reinstated the "notability" tag. Let's let AfD decide...are the reviews online good enough to support the notability of this film, or does it fail WP:NFILM, and if so, it should be deleted. Donaldd23 (talk) 03:52, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 03:52, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 03:52, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment/Keep Well, i am sure there is a lots of thing to dig out from Hong Kong Public Library news/multimedia archive. https://mmis.hkpl.gov.hk/ Matthew hk (talk) 04:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * e.g.
 * "宗華信讒言 被稱大殺手" 1972-01-07 The Kung Sheung Evening News Industrial and Commercial Daily Press Matthew hk (talk) 05:42, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Well, a poster from this 1972 film is seen in the film Cecil B. Demented from the year 2000, so The Killer don't seem to be a completely forgotten or overlooked production. Oleryhlolsson (talk) 09:47, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Oleryhlolssons rationale. And WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 18:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.