Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Kipnuk Adventure Series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:04, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

The Kipnuk Adventure Series

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to be a notable book series. The only hits I could find online are websites selling the books (such as Amazon), or profiles on websites such as Goodreads or FictionDB. No reliable coverage or reviews could be found. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:21, 7 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as this is nearly even speedy material with no better signs of a better notable article here. SwisterTwister   talk  08:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. This appears to be a self-published series and while that doesn't mean that it's automatically non-notable, it does make it very unlikely that it'll pass. I could find nothing to suggest that it's notable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:00, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK. No reliable sources found, only the usual bookseller and other non-useable sites.Coolabahapple (talk) 15:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete – Does not meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Not finding any coverage in reliable sources from search links atop this discussion. North America1000 16:34, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.