Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Klute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. TigerShark 22:10, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

The Klute
Can't find evidence of notability Nv8200p talk 19:44, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity page Bwithh 19:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Isn't calling it a vanity page a heavy accusation? You're implying that the editor who originated the article is the article subject himself. Parsssseltongue 21:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Speedy Keep Needs expansion, verifiable sources cited, etc. (give me some time, I can do it myself!), but this individual is notable. Parsssseltongue 19:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment That's not criteria for a "speedy keep" vote. If you can add info, then by all means, please do so. However, there's no provision in WP:SK which is met by this article. -- Kicking222 20:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Misunderstood phrase "speedy keep." Sorry, still new. And Kicking, are you following me? :) Parsssseltongue 21:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * LOL, no. And for the record, I have no vote on this article, so I'm not even going to cancel out your keep vote. ;) -- Kicking222 23:15, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete NN --Runcorn 11:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --TeaDrinker 17:07, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find evidence of any awards or real success. BlueValour 20:18, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.