Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Klute Game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:05, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

The Klute Game
Listed as speedy but was removed by a new user account whose sole edit was to remove the speedy note. Non-notable topic with little to no context. Sounds like some small game or meme that doesn't even reach the smallest requirements for being on wikipedia. Lid 10:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Well what exactly is the point of Wikipedia then if we can't add things that are big, locally? Just because you've never heard of it, doesn't mean its not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stone443 (talk • contribs)
 * The point of Wikipedia is to be an encyclopaedia whose articles readers can double-check for themselves, that doesn't promote new syntheses, analyses, or ideas that have yet to become a part of the corpus of human knowledge, and that does not endorse any particular point of view in a discussion. If you've come here thinking that Wikipedia is a publisher of first instance, you've come to the wrong place.  The places for documenting new things are academic journals, books, and the inventors' own web sites. Uncle G 10:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete at zero Google hits, I wouldn't say this was of even local interest. Probably a WP:NFT case, if anything. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  10:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is supposed to be as reliable as we can get it. Articles need to be verifiable through reputable third party sources. You're supposed to prove it actually exists and is not a case of WP:NFT. - Mgm|(talk) 10:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, no reliable sources so verifiable. Highly likely made up if not an outright hoax. Gwernol 10:44, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, just as I did with the last attempt to create this stupid article. violet/riga (t) 11:04, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a hosting service for game ideas. Wimstead 11:12, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and protect since this is the second attempt at creating the article. NawlinWiki 11:27, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable, unverifiable. --Ter e nce Ong (T 13:23, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete the article has no reliable, third party sources. WilyD 14:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Reminder to nominator - please mention "CSD", "db" or similar text in your edit summary when you stick a speedy delete tag on any article. Also, non-notability is not a criteria for speedy deletion. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 04:31, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Under A7 non-notability is a criteria for speedy deltion and this article falls under G4 as previously deleted content. I realise that A7 doesn't apply here but non-notability is a speedy criteria at least in A7. --- Lid 04:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * A7 is not about non-notability, it is about the lack of assertion of notability. These are not the same. Whether the assertion(s) of notability is valid grounds for keeping an article is for an AfD to decide. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 06:11, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.