Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Kung Fu Mummy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The lack of coverage in reliable sources is the decisive factor here. Flowerparty ☀ 17:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

The Kung Fu Mummy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Earned a non-notable award, no notable people involved, no reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:47, 5 June 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 05:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – I could not find anything providing any significant coverage (i.e. besides trivial mentions or listings) in my Bing search (see, trying this as a trial alternative to Google). MuZemike 01:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per improvements: Before, After.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:49, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per muzemike and nom. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 23:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Every film deserves its own article, enough saidHappy Evil Dude (talk) 09:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable movie. Colonel Warden (talk) 17:42, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete we don't need to massage the ego of Randy Morgan. Darrenhusted (talk) 17:45, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Claiming an article about The Kung Fu Mummy is all about massaging the ego of its director is akin to claiming the Schindler's List article is only there to massage Steven Spielberg's ego. Happy Evil Dude (talk) 09:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.