Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The L. Ron Hubbard Series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to L. Ron Hubbard. There's no individual notability here and User:Colliric has already merged the content. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:15, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

The L. Ron Hubbard Series

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable per WP:NBOOK. Found one somewhat reliable independent source, a Village Voice blog post which mocks it as a scam to take money from Scientology members (cost $750). Regardless of the reviewers opinion, there is little to show notability ie. discussed in multiple independent sources. Green Cardamom (talk) 02:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I do not agree with this in principle, as it is the Church's only notable biographical work about their founder, but I agree as the page currently stands it should be deleted because it's too short, but the Link in the template should remain and be redirected to the section on "Biographies" contained in the L. Ron Hubbard article, where this information possibly can be added. So I believe the page should be copied(or rewritten) and put into the LRH article, and then this page be a redirect to that. In fact that is what I will do now. Colliric (talk) 05:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete COS religious promotional material of no independant notability or worth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathlibrarian (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 1 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:53, 7 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete While there are other references not included in this article that give the book non-trivial treatment,   and, this does not, in fact, meet WP:NBOOK, in my view. Jinkinson (talk) 02:20, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect I was going to suggest a merge with the article for L. Ron Hubbard, but it appears Colliric suggested it, and decided to be bold and just do it. I believe the page should be redirected now, unless anybody disagrees with the merge. {{{sub|C}}  A S U K I T E  T} 02:29, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.