Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The LIP Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  12:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

The LIP Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Now defunct magazine, currently memorialised on the co-publisher's website. Fails WP:GNG, WP:WEB. No evidence of notability during its short life and none online. Sourcing is merely a list of interviews they ran, zero evidence of sustained independent coverage. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Websites,  and United Kingdom. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Doesn't pass WP:GNG. The current sources are almost completely primary, with one passing mention of it as part of a mention of an essay they published. Not finding any sigcov out there of the magazine itself. WikiVirusC (talk) 13:32, 1 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.