Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The L Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

The L Magazine

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability has not been established and the lack of third-party sources proves this, just as in the case of Daniel Stedman, which was kept because of WP:ILIKEIT. Laval (talk) 04:31, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails notability.Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 04:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:56, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - No notability established via the proper reliable independent sources, created by COI account, advertising, etc. DreamGuy (talk) 14:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.