Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Label (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

The Label
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparently non-notable future movie, WP:CRYSTAL. First AFD nomination was handled badly by the nominator, and it'd be too difficult to gauge consensus, so making a clean start. Running an extra day won't hurt anything, there is no deadline, and this way the outcome will be more clear. —Random832 17:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * delete - after looking at it, even setting aside the problems with the first debate, this doesn't seem to be a notable film; IMDB inclusion alone is not generally considered evidence of notability. Not spam anymore, but still not notable. —Random832 17:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete again, due to WP:COI, WP:CRYSTAL and unverifiability. Tony Fox (arf!) 18:28, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * weak delete again can't find any verification via wp:rs, imdb and wikipedia seem to be the only significant links. Pharmboy (talk) 19:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails the notability requirements for films:
 * - has not been released and its production was neither notable nor received any coverage;
 * - is not the subject of any full-length reviews or articles;
 * - has not received any awards, is not included in any curricula and has not been selected for inclusion in a national archive;
 * - no sources to indicate a unique contribution to cinema or its genre;
 * - is not one of the most important roles performed by any notable people (in fact, does not feature any notable people at all); and
 * - has not been successfully distributed in any country or region where film distribution is otherwise unlikely.
 * The only apaprent sources are imdb and similar mass-listing sites, which are specifically excluded from the definition of reliable sources for movies. Euryalus (talk) 20:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete NN crystal ball gazing Mayalld (talk) 12:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.