Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lace Wig Bible


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:57, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

The Lace Wig Bible

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

this is not a notable book, refs dont indicate this is more than a routine manual. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Sources are not very strong to show notability per WP:NBOOK. Juicymagonline.com is OK (but not really a review) the rest are unreliable (the Dallasblack source is tagged "Advertisement"). -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: No notability. Fails WP:BK. SL93 (talk) 01:43, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's nothing out there to show that this passes notability guidelines. It's fairly well laid out from what I can see on Amazon, but having a potentially good product doesn't make something pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:32, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - notable books generally have reviews in the New York Times, or the New York Review of Books, or a lifestyle magazine such as Women's Wear Daily, or a relevant scholarly publication (such as Science), per criteria # 1 of WP:NBOOK. This has nothing from any criteria. Bearian (talk) 15:45, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.