Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lahore Times


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

The Lahore Times

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is not a print newspaper but just a ordinary online news website.It is not worth to have a WP article at this stage. Saqib (talk) 09:18, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak delete: Has a claim of notability, but no sources. -- MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥) (please reply using &#x7B;&#x7B;ping&#x7D;&#x7D;) 10:03, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥) (please reply using &#x7B;&#x7B;ping&#x7D;&#x7D;) 10:03, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  16:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)


 * delete I attempted to source it by checking whether major international press had covered it. Started with a search of the NYTimes.  got this: "After a Bullet in the Head, Assaults on a Pakistani Schoolgirl's ... thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/.../after-a-bullet-in-the-head-assaults-on-a-pakistani-school...Oct 16, 2012 - That report, from a Web site called The Lahore Times, which is set up to look like a replica of The New York Times..."  In other words, This is not a "real" newspaper.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:49, 9 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.