Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Airbender casting controversy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to The Last Airbender. (non-admin closure) Off2riorob (talk) 16:51, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

The Last Airbender casting controversy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article presents information already found in page for The Last Airbender. WP:NOTNEWS, the movie hasn't even come out yet. Separate article not warranted based on lack of information and also information that can be presented in other article. Dylan0513 (talk) 21:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:30, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Userfy to creator's user space, looks like an article that has pontential but is unfinished nevertheless. Rohedin  TALK 16:50, 4 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect to The Last Airbender where this subject is already discussed. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:03, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. I don't think it warrants a separate article, besides, there's nothing to complain about, Aasif Mandvi is so asian, he's ninja!--137.122.49.102 (talk) 18:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect: I would say delete per the amount of WP:OR the article contains. However, the OR material can be removed. That would leave a duplicate of the The Last Airbender. So, as stated above, redirect to where its already discussed. Akerans (talk) 19:21, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect The place for this is discussed in the casting section of The Last Airbender. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.21.122.234 (talk) 05:29, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.