Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Daughter of Gallifrey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 23:01, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

The Last Daughter of Gallifrey

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsourced, non-notable fanwank. Even the name is a neologism with no support. Sceptre (talk) 15:33, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * See if there's anything that can be salvaged for inclusion in Time Lord. If so, redirect there. Otherwise, delete. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 21 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge to Time Lord. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:21, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Time Lord or delete. A brief character appearance, no real-world information in the article, some speculation - looks like fancruft, not the fundament of a notable character. – sgeureka t•c 11:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, and wait to be redirected, in "A Good Man Goes to War", it is strongly implied that this little girl is River Song; if this is confirmed in the episodes to be aired in the fall, then this could redirect to that article. However, the title is conjuctural and would not be appropriate; River isn't even from Gallifrey. And if she isn't River, she is still (so far) a character not notable enough to have her own article. Glimmer721  talk  22:31, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - appears to be a neologism made up by some fans, with no official basis. Do not merge to Time Lord -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:52, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - No sources, WP:ESSAY Edgepedia (talk) 12:26, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per Sceptre. Njsustain (talk) 18:09, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per ChrisTheDude. There is no reliably sourced information to merge. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.