Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Plague


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 02:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

The Last Plague

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NBOOK. I can't find any sources that assert the book's notability. ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 23:45, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I have left a note on the page's 'talk' tab, but could someone please explain in plain English what exactly this 'notability' or lack thereof actually entails? I'm not sure I get it. Surely the fact that the book exists is enough to gain it inclusion in an encyclopaedia...? I must confess to not really understanding Wikipedia at all and how it works... Paulfny (talk) 23:54, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Greetings Paulfny. When other Wikipedia editors say that your article does not meet the notability guidelines, it means that they don't think that your topic is important enough to have an encyclopedia article written about it. Click on this link for more information about notability - WP:N
 *  Bfpage &#124;leave a message 01:33, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment In this particular case, no significant reviews cited means a "no go" on notability. HullIntegrity  \ talk / 01:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Delete -- Someone with no COI needs to establish notability or this article should go. HullIntegrity \ talk / 01:33, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete doesnt meet WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK found only 1 usable ref Coolabahapple (talk) 01:23, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unfortunately, it looks like there aren't any professional reviews from reliable sources.  The story in a local newspaper is something, but it's certainly not enough to demonstrate notability by itself.  If the book gets reviewed at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, or other horror-themed sites, it can be recreated.  Self-published blogs really aren't good enough. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:20, 5 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.