Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Shot 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is that there is insufficient coverage in reliable sources to confer notability. Mkativerata (talk) 18:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

The Last Shot 2

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Student movie, not notable. Author has been doing this before Articles for deletion/The last shot (2010 film) CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 16:35, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I wish all the best to the filmmaker, and hope he gets his big break - but this ain't it. No media coverage, no reliable sources that indicate any level of notability - indeed, I see no claim that the film itself is notable. See also Articles for deletion/The Last Shot (2010 film). UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 21:23, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. The film is definitely notable. With the film's IMDB page and it's link right on the front of the article, this film has been released to the public. If it wasn't true, it wouldn't be on IMDB to begin with as they check all references regarding the film and its notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by N easter12345 (talk • contribs) 23:38, January 11, 2011
 * The most IMDB can do for this film is confirm its existance, just as does the film itself. What is required for notability is to have articles about the film in reliable sources or better... being able to show the film has won notable awards. Please review WP:TOOSOON and the essay "Newcomer's guide to guidelines" Regards,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - having and IMDB page is not proof of notability (see WP:NFILM). IMDB is not considered a reliable source either.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 23:58, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON (if ever). While happy to congratulate these high school filmmakers for their creative efforts, high school films by student filmmakers rarely achieve the coverage required to meet inclusion criteria.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.