Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Star


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep.  Citi Cat   ♫ 01:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

The Last Star

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Was nominated for speedy deletion, but not for a valid speedy reason, in any case this album does not seem to assert why its notable and needs an encyclopaedia entry. In addition no references. ——  Eagle 101 Need help? 00:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 02:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 *  Strong Speedy Delete Very little substantive content, appears to be little more than a track listing. No context, no assertion of notability, CSD A7. Rackabello 04:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - The band Halfcocked has had an article on here for years, which probably means they are notable, which probably means their albums are notable, according to WP:MUSIC. While it's true these articles aren't much more than tracklistings, the three Halfcocked album articles up for deletion haven't exactly had much time to grow, being created only yesterday. --Bongwarrior 05:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was the one who nominated this for speedy deletion, although at the time all that was there was a tracklist and one line of info. I'm still new to this line of wiki work and so I'm still prone to mistakes :). Personally, I don't think notability is inherited and the album should be deleted since it has no sources and no possibility for any. Seraphim  Whipp 09:16, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * With Precious Roy's additions, I change my vote to keep. Seraphim  Whipp 22:03, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Major label album by notable (-enough) band. Article needs work, not deleting. Precious Roy 13:47, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * There is nothing that can be done to improve these articles. There are no references in the articles and no sources that exist to ever improve this article. Seraphim  Whipp 15:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.