Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Western


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. Davewild (talk) 11:38, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

The Last Western

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No indication of meeting WP:NBOOK criteria. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 11:28, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, article already shows multiple reviews from reliable sources like Publishers Weekly, and The Critic. Additional sources could be easily found at google books (392 entries). A search on News archives reveal multiple articles on Los Angeles Times  plus the already mentioned article on The Advocate. Clearly passes  WP:NBOOK criterium #1. A withdrawal is suggested. Cavarrone (talk) 12:31, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 22:10, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Multiple independent reviews. Tonywalton Talk 23:46, 23 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: Notable based on the above sources. SL93 (talk) 22:25, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: Article is notable per Cavarrone (above)  Theopolisme TALK 04:45, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.