Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Learning Station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

The Learning Station

 * – ( View AfD View log )

not notable, see WP:BAND — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oceanoceadd (talk • contribs) 23:11, February 28, 2011
 * Fixed malformed nomination. lifebaka++ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 00:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Billboard has covered this children's music group calling them noteworthy, some PBS thing, and one of their videos. -- Whpq (talk) 17:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha Quadrant    talk    15:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Note Just add more external verifiable sources, but notability sustained. Smithsonian  (talk) 17:23, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't see any indication that this band passes the criteria in WP:BAND. Not signed in a major label, no third-party references, etc. Ingadres (talk) 17:50, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep – meets WP:BAND criterion #1, per the coverage found by Whpq, as well as this in the Hartford Courant, this in the The Times (Shreveport), this in The Bradenton Herald, this in Uppermichiganssource.com, as well as several articles in School Library Journal. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 02:38, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Why these sources are not included in the article? And, if the band is notable, why is there almost no information about it? It could be written from the sources you mentioned. Ingadres (talk) 16:50, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.