Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Legend of Neil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - withdrawn by nominator OrangeDog (talk • edits) 21:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC)


 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsure if subject meets WP:WEB OrangeDog (talk • edits) 17:58, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Not sure about Tubefilter, but Fox Business, IO9, and the Toronto Star (which I just found via Google News and added) are all perfectly fine references. Seems to meet both the WP:GNG and WP:WEB criterion 1. Jclemens (talk) 20:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  —Jclemens (talk) 20:48, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The article has come a long way since earlier today, and the sources assert notability pretty clearly at this point. WP:WEB requires that "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself"; that is the case now. I agree that Tubefilter isn't the best source, but it seems to deal with such media, and the other refs look fine. -Phoenixrod (talk) 21:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I think the sources found today now clearly place this on the keep side. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 21:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * So, you're the nominator. Since no one has yet !voted delete, you can simply withdraw the nomination if you're now convinced it's a keeper. Jclemens (talk) 21:29, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.